Living Life Adventurously
Article first published in The Sidcotian, 2014; photo credit: Louisa Gillett
The trouble with making your dreams come true is what to do with the rest of your life. I wonder if I would have done things differently if I had known this at 15, but I suspect not. In any event, I remember my worst fear was always the thought of waking up aged 35 (the oldest I could image at that point!), and being full of regret for the things I wished I had done.
Unlike my peers, I never had doubts about what I wanted to do. I knew from very early on that I was going to go down the Amazon and everything I did was within that context. My MA in Latin American History and Archaeology was preparation for my expedition; so was language school in Barcelona, and attending the annual Expedition Planning Events at the Royal Geographical Society in London. Two marriage proposals were turned down during and after university, not least because I could hardly expect someone to wait for me while I followed my real passion.
Most publishers refused to bet any money on me, convinced I would not live to tell my tale, but I did, and Random House in the UK published An Amazon and a Donkey in 1991. It was a wonderful culmination to my life’s dream. But already, on reaching the Brazilian city of Belém at the mouth of the Amazon River, I had been confronted with the powerful realization that making your dream come true is a hollow victory if you have no one to share it with. Soon the future yawned ahead like a black hole and I felt bereft of purpose and very lonely.
Of course I discovered that a passion for adventure is not something that is quenched with one journey. Sooner or later, inspiration for another project comes along and I have tried hard to make each one happen. Some got turned into books (The Amber Trail and Chickenbus Journey). My greatest joy, however, came from finding someone to join me, who managed to survive 20 years in my company before fading away into another life. I am left with two sons and a huge well of gratitude.
And still I am not ready to admit that I am finished with passion or adventure! My sons laugh incredulously at me when I tell them I intend to buy a motorcycle for my very own South American road trip. They see a small woman with silver hair who has to stand on tip toe to kiss their cheeks. But I know that all I need is someone to teach me how to ride a Yamaha 250 and I’m off. The protective gear has been in my cupboard ever since we emigrated to Chile in 2006. Little do they realize the only reason I had sons was to help raise the sails in the South Pacific, but I’m beginning to see I may need a grown man for that one…
I love them both!
Article first published in The Biographer’s Craft, 2017
Memoir was recently referred to as the evil twin of biography (TBC, April 2017), which perhaps explains why the spot dedicated to ‘First-Person Narrative’ at our May conference in Boston remained embarrassingly empty. Indeed, the table seemed so big and so bare compared to the busy hub of discussions going on elsewhere, the five who did gather there hardly dared to sit down. To keep within the family metaphor, I am personally much more disturbed by the twins’ step-sister Biofiction. What bizarre progeny is that?
When I stop to think about it, perhaps it was a bit odd to propose this particular topic for discussion at a gathering of people committed to objective research in telling people’s lives. Yet, as writers, we can surely all agree there is a place for experimentation with first-person narrative, even within the serious presentation of a life: an epilogue that describes a particularly thrilling discovery, for example. And what about Ruth Scurr’s celebrated presentation of John Aubrey’s life, written as if it were his voice?
In any event, it has been said that in their choice of subjects for research, biographers are always telling a story of their own – whether they realize it or not. And what is wrong with that, if it helps to fine tune the author’s empathy and intuition? I detect a distinct hint of jealousy for the freedom of memoir; a bit of sour grapes for the slack regard for proper references and sources; and even envy for memoir’s enduring popularity. But surely there is no need to be so prickly. It ought to be possible to acknowledge the differences and unique nature of each member of the life-writing family and plenty of highly regarded writers have experimented not only with memoir, but also with autobiography (is it triplets then?).
But therein lies the nub: the specific differences have not been clarified to everyone’s satisfaction. Identities have been confused and honors inappropriately granted, so an insistence on clarity is not only correct, it is fundamental to good relations. In the meantime, though, it would be nice not to feel like I’ve let the side down in daring to write a memoir.
I rejoice in my love for serious biography, both as a reader and as a writer. I hope our relationship lasts a lifetime. But I make no apologies for having partied with beguiling memoir. It was a one-off thing, to be sure, but I’ve never had more fun nor learned as much – it was the making of me.
Wild Heart: Growing up Forty Years Late is looking for an agent.
Gracias a la vida: a solo expedition to Peru 30 years on
A version of this article with relevant photos was first published in the Peruvian Times in 2019.
We arrived in Chiquián in the dark and it was still pouring with rain. As soon as the truck stopped, people began climbing over each other in search of their luggage; while outside, men in brown ponchos watched in silence as the rain splattered on to the road and water dripped from their felt hats. I felt uneasy: all the baddies from every cowboy film I had ever seen seemed to be lurking under those hats.
Thus I wrote in 1989, on my first attempt to walk into the Cordillera Huayhuash, beginning in the small mountain town of Chiquián, which was at the end of the road back then.
This time, a scheduled bus left Huaraz at 5am in the morning, and I huddled in my seat as the dawn cold penetrated through an open window in the roof. But it was the height of luxury compared to last time, perched on 30 sacks of rice with a dozen others, with nothing but a plastic sheet to protect us from the driving rain.
A misty daybreak revealed the changing landscape, as we drove 80km south, past the treeless highlands below Pastoruri and into the fecund suntrap that is the mighty canyon of the Rio Pativilca, where Chiquián perches on a ledge at 3,374m. A very bumpy dirt road continued where once I had had to walk eight hours to the village of Llamac, and I could only marvel. Did I really walk 21km to Llamac all that time ago? The scenery is as new to me; but the memory of my aching feet and the thirsty agony of trying to keep up with the donkey driver I had hired for the first ten days is as tangible now, as if it were yesterday.
I try hard to identify landmarks from thirty years ago, but the only one I can recognize with any certainty is the river at the bottom of the canyon, which was the setting for my first major mistake back then: I forgot to fill my water bottle and was so desperate for a drink after five hours of arduous walking, I threw caution to the wind and drank from the river. Seven months of amoebic dysentery was the price.
Almost to my delight, the bus breaks down and we passengers laugh at the fact we had only just overtaken a fancy minivan full of trekkers, which was now stuck behind us. But ingenuity and a handy shovel solved everyone’s problem in less than an hour, and I was almost sorry not to have to walk the last few hours, especially when I observed our driver look away from the road for far too long, every time he needed to sink his hand into the broken gear box to complete the miracle of making it work all the same.
I never expected to be returning to the Cordillera Huayhuash during this short 2-week anniversary visit. Even today, it is much more remote than the neighbouring Cordillera Blanca, and I assumed it would be too difficult, despite the new road to Llamac. I had no idea if there was anywhere to stay and no contacts within easy reach either. My discovery that regular tours now trace the ‘Huayhuash Circuit’ changed nothing – I had neither the funds nor the desire to revisit any part of my route in the company of strangers half my age. But the magic that is South America waved its wand, and a chance conversation in Huaraz granted me a spontaneous invitation to stay at the family home of my hostel manager Angel.
Staying in Llamac exorcised an important ghost for me, for it was the setting of some of the most miserable days of my life and to return now – fit and well, and with the benefit of sunshine and a safe haven – felt liberating. How lovely it was to stroll around the village without a care in the world, to enjoy the bubbling river, and stop for flowers and the peaceful sight of villagers going about their business.
‘Pay me 2 Soles!’ was a rude awakening from sentimentality, however, the response to my request to take an old man’s photo.
Progress and a link to the outside world have come at a high price in Llamac, and there is much anger and bitterness in the village, if you scratch the surface. It is the same tragedy that has befallen indigenous communities all over the world, where corporate business has discovered mineral wealth to be exploited. In this case, it is the Japanese Mitsui Kinzoku mining company that installed its open-pit zinc mine at Pallca, 13km upriver from Llamac, in 2006.
The access road and paved streets, the electricity and piped water, a primary and secondary school, and the health centre – all these were donated by the mining company. Combined with the promise of guaranteed work, it seemed like a blessing to the local farmers, who had no idea what the small print meant, nor any inkling how their ancestral lands and way of life was about to be destroyed.
The way Angel tells it, the village elders were entrusted with the negotiations and ‘public consultations’ held with the mine’s representatives, from the late 1990s onwards. But they were as incapable of assessing the technical information they were presented with, as they were amenable to being paid off. Thus one local ‘environmental impact assessor’ was suddenly the owner of a brand new pick-up truck, and other community leaders mysteriously could afford to build themselves large new houses.
Among the many betrayals the villagers of Llamac feel themselves to be victim, is the bitter knowledge their own community representatives sold them out. Literally, because the ordinary villagers were under the impression they were renting their ancestral lands to the mine for a limited period and would keep their grazing and free passage rights. Instead, a huge swathe of the headwaters of the Llamac River was sold behind their backs and, apart from the ‘gifts’ to infrastructure mentioned above, the village coffers never received a cent.
To add insult to injury, mining operations have expanded well beyond the original demarcation, to include open cast mining that now threatens the jewel of the Cordillera Huayhuash: the twin lakes of Jahuacocha and Carhuacocha, and therefore even the villagers’ limited opportunity to cash in on the tourist dollar, during the short summer season. Also, their river is so heavily polluted with residual mining effluents, the trout have died and the pastures no longer support healthy livestock or corn.
‘The only people you will meet in the village are children or old people,’ Angel had warned me.
Sadly, he was not exaggerating. There is no longer any kind of sustainable economic life possible for the villagers of Llamac. For what the mine failed to mention regarding the guaranteed work was that it would be on a strict 15-day rota – a quincenal, as the locals call it – and that wages would be set so low, it is impossible to feed a family.
It was a sleight of hand typical of interactions between the villagers and the mine, who persuaded them it was a great idea, because they would have 15 days each month to work their land. Except the land is now useless and a mine worker has to wait an average of three quincenals, before he is allowed to have his next turn. When the young men of Llamac protested, state forces were brought in to beat them back with rubber bullets and tear gas.
I struggle to fathom the reality of the poison river. All around me I see beautiful pastures and content animals, but I can’t help noticing the leaky system of black irrigation pipes coming off the mountain, rather than from the river itself, and tinned tuna is much more prevalent than native trout. Many homes in the village stand locked and silent, and plenty of adobe houses are disintegrating. Even sadder is to hear the locals refer to the smattering of new houses built of brick and concrete as made of material noble. Their expensive corrugated roofing considered vastly superior to traditional red tiles or thatch.
Nevertheless, Llamac treated me to one of the happiest days of my life this time. Rising at dawn, I took my tuna fish sandwich and filled water bottles up the steep and dusty trail towards the Pampa Llamac pass at 4,300m, and was rewarded with the magnificent sight of four summits over 6000m high – the mightiest of all Yerupajá (6,634m). Nothing could spoil my sense of achievement or my joy to see this gorgeous landscape once more. Doomed it may well be – but not today!
* * *
On my last day in Huaraz, there was only one thing to do. I wanted to go to the village of Olleros, 40 minutes’ drive outside the city, to honour the life of Edwin Bartley, who was murdered by the Sendero Luminoso during the very same period I was walking in the Andes, alone with my donkey.
That day, thirty years ago, he had the misfortune to arrive too late for transport back to Huaraz, after his hike from Chavin, and so asked the local community leader for shelter in the municipal hall. It was the correct procedure, but a unit of Sendero attacked at midnight, and Edwin’s safe haven was no more.
‘Is there anyone in there?’ they asked the guard.
At first, he refused to unlock the door, but when the guerrillas threatened to break it down and shoot him, he quickly admitted there was a gringo sleeping inside and unlocked the door, before running for his life.
‘He would have lived if the guard had kept his mouth shut,’ my local informant told me.
Edwin was dragged outside and tied to a park bench opposite the municipal building, and then shot in the chest.
‘They didn’t even know how to kill properly,’ he said, remembering the events of that night for me.
‘When we shoot our animals, we only need one shot.’
But the first bullet, according to this eye-witness, entered Edwin’s chest and went diagonally through his body, exiting by his kidneys.
‘His blood ran down the street there,’ he said, pointing to the incline below the bench.
‘And did he not try to say something to save himself?’ I asked.
‘Oh yes, he screamed pitifully.
‘I saw the whole thing from the window up there,’ he continued, pointing to a building on the corner of the plaza.
‘I didn’t see,’ said the lady sitting on the very bench, now bathed in a peaceful mid-day sun.
‘But I heard the shots.’
It took two more shots to kill the gringo. In the morning, the police from Huaraz came to take him away.
‘Has his family ever come here?’ I asked, but the villagers didn’t think so.
So I was all the more pleased to be able to leave a white rose on the bench where Edwin Bartley died – to honour his life and in thanks for mine. I could so easily have shared the same fate. But I was lucky, and the sheer arbitrariness of it increases my gratitude a hundred-fold.
I leave the friendly villagers of Olleros behind, travelling in the very same type of van Edwin would have needed to escape his fate. As if to remind me that everyone can get unlucky at any moment – not just gringos – we pass a large funeral procession for a local man killed in a bar brawl.
Edwin Bartley was 24 and I was 27 back then, in 1989. Today, I have an extra thirty years of life behind me and am the mother of two sons – my most precious gift.